
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3
From: "Robert E. Lee" <robert () outpost24 com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:22:17 +0100
Fyodor, et al This is in response to: http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2008/q1/0116.html Tyler was getting so many dropped packets because the TSC on his computer is misbehaving. He needed to use the GTOD or Sleep timer options instead to have accurate scan. By default, unicornscan will send at 300 packets per second. By default, it should take ~3 minutes, 45 seconds to complete a full 65k port scan. =-=-=-=-=-=-= Here is a more accurate picture: This output isn't meant to make either project look better than the other; heads up output against one host on the internet in a pure speed shoot out isn't that interesting. Fyodor and I have spoken several times offline about speed and neither of our projects care about speed at the expense of accuracy. But since all this hoopla started on the speed topic, here are some results from our test machine. I scanned scanme.insecure.org from a co-located machine with a good amount of bandwidth. Scanme is mostly filtered with some open and some closed ports. These filtered, over the Internet scans are what Unicornscan shines at. =-=-=-=-= # time us scanme.insecure.org/32:a -L2 -r75000 -E TCP open ssh[ 22] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 TCP closed smtp[ 25] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 TCP open domain[ 53] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 TCP closed gopher[ 70] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 TCP open http[ 80] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 TCP closed ident[ 113] from 205.217.153.62 ttl 52 real 0m4.701s user 0m0.441s sys 0m0.588s =-=-=-=-= # time nmap -p0-65535 scanme.insecure.org Starting Nmap 4.53 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-01-24 02:26 PST Interesting ports on scanme.nmap.org (205.217.153.62): Not shown: 65530 filtered ports PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 25/tcp closed smtp 53/tcp open domain 70/tcp closed gopher 80/tcp open http 113/tcp closed auth Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 140.339 seconds real 2m20.344s user 0m0.066s sys 0m0.045s =-=-=-=-= # time nmap -p0-65535 -T5 --max-retries 0 scanme.insecure.org Starting Nmap 4.53 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-01-24 02:31 PST Warning: Giving up on port early because retransmission cap hit. Interesting ports on scanme.nmap.org (205.217.153.62): Not shown: 65530 filtered ports PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 25/tcp closed smtp 53/tcp open domain 70/tcp closed gopher 80/tcp open http 113/tcp closed auth Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 49.875 seconds real 0m49.879s user 0m0.062s sys 0m0.058s =-=-=-=-= 4.7 vs 49.87 seconds. We've reported the exact same findings (no dropped packets). Cheers, Robert -- Robert E. Lee Chief Security Officer Outpost24 - One Step Ahead http://www.outpost24.com SE Phone: +46 455-61-2320 US Phone: +1 801-924-5902 email: robert () outpost24 com _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 kx (Jan 05)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Fyodor (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Brandon Enright (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 doug (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 bensonk (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Tyler Reguly (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Fyodor (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Tyler Reguly (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Tyler Reguly (Jan 14)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Brandon Enright (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Fyodor (Jan 13)
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Martin Mačok (Jan 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PortBunny - FX and Fabs at 24C3 Robert E. Lee (Jan 24)