
Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: ambiguity about nmap results
From: Aaron Leininger <rilian4 () hotmail com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 18:33:17 -0700
Debian is worse, much worse. Both the test and unstable branches have 4.53-3 as the latest.
I use debian on a couple servers and I have nmap on them. I never use debian's nmap package. I always compile it from source to get the more up to date version from fyodor. Aaron
Stable is listed as 4.11-1! According to the nmap changelog, that was "stable" on 2006/06/23, coming close to two years ago. Nmap is so much better than it was back then!
Hear Hear!! _________________________________________________________________ Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety. http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_family_safety_052008 _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results, (continued)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Brandon Enright (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Kris Katterjohn (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results doug (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results bensonk (May 31)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results doug (May 31)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Aaron Leininger (May 31)