
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Bug(s) in Nmap 4.60.
From: "Mr Harry!" <nokia1 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:35:47 +0100
Hi, I've noticed a few issues with Nmap v4.60 that I thought I would email about: I've come across a few 'applications' using port zero over the last few years and have been able to scan it with Nmap until version 4.60. Seem to get an error straight away when scanning it now: (Scanning using an up-to-date Windows XP SP2 host) C:\Documents and Settings\User>nmap -sT 172.20.2.33 -p 0 Starting Nmap 4.60 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-04-07 14:48 GMT Standard T ime Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory Strange read error from 172.20.2.33 (10049 - 'Unknown error'): No such file o r directory All other ports seem to work fine and as expected: C:\Documents and Settings\User>nmap -sT 172.20.2.33 -p 10 Starting Nmap 4.60 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-04-07 14:50 GMT Standard Time Interesting ports on 172.20.2.33: PORT STATE SERVICE 10/tcp filtered unknown MAC Address: 00:19:B9:5E:B2:32 (Dell) Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.750 seconds I know the issues with using port 0 for a service etc but I have seen it used in the past and have compiled the odd program to use it – as mentioned all previous versions of Nmap seem to be able to scan it. I have also noticed a massive timing difference with the new version. I had a range of 12 IP's to scan this morning on all ports (over the internet but they were only behind a PIX 515E, no nIDS / nIPS etc)- Nmap 4.60 said it would take 32 hours to scan – version 4.52 ran in less than 8 minutes. As a kind of basic test I scanned an un-firewalled XP sp2 host on a gigabit switch (the same switch I was on) and 4.60 said it would take 4 hours 2 minutes – version 4.52 finished in under a minute - the host responded to ICMP etc so the timing should have been OK. I don't think it is hardware / network related as 4.52 seems to work fine on the same host and network Just thought I'd let the dev(s) know. _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Bug(s) in Nmap 4.60. Mr Harry! (Apr 08)