
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 - Update patch
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:41:17 -0700
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 09:04:21PM -0500, Tom Sellers wrote:
Thanks for challenging me on this patch. I have attached a new, better, patch below. This patch does not make a log in attempt, but uses a basic, pre auth request instead. It will match several vendors and trigger fingerprint output for unrecognized services.
Thanks Tom! This looks great and I've applied it. -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Tom Sellers (Jun 17)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Fyodor (Jun 17)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Tom Sellers (Jun 17)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Fyodor (Jun 18)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Tom Sellers (Jun 18)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 - Update patch Tom Sellers (Jun 21)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 - Update patch Fyodor (Jun 28)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Tom Sellers (Jun 17)
- Re: Determining UDP 161 port (SNMP) status using SNMPv3 Fyodor (Jun 17)