Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Bad IP-checksums
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:40:17 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:35:36 -0600 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
The problem showed itself on little-endian machines. Does that make sense with the architectures of your Linux and Windows boxes? Or if they have the same endianness, maybe they have different Nmap versions. David Fifield
Makes sense. Nmap SVN on x86_64 Linux Nmap 4.62 on x86 Windows Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiKcncACgkQqaGPzAsl94IT2gCfYBHzL5rPCkQZwt1kN53I9nDf E0gAnjulWGdW8Fc1MEyR8W9CwGhVYLuJ =k74K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Jul 25)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Brandon Enright (Jul 25)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums David Fifield (Jul 25)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Brandon Enright (Jul 25)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Jul 26)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Jul 26)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Aug 15)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Fyodor (Aug 15)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Aug 15)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Michael Pattrick (Aug 15)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Aug 16)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums David Fifield (Aug 20)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Michael Pattrick (Aug 20)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Gisle Vanem (Aug 21)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums David Fifield (Jul 25)
- Re: Bad IP-checksums Brandon Enright (Jul 25)
