Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nbase MD5 and SHA1 break static builds
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:52:17 -0600
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 08:46:36PM +0200, Philip Pickering wrote:
2008/8/5 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>: I think the only problem are those conflicting definitions. I don't really think they are still needed and if they are then they should probably be renamed, as the other functions have been (by adding the nb_ prefix). Please try the attached patch and tell me if it works for you.
Yes, it works. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- nbase MD5 and SHA1 break static builds David Fifield (Aug 05)
- Re: nbase MD5 and SHA1 break static builds Philip Pickering (Aug 05)
- Re: nbase MD5 and SHA1 break static builds David Fifield (Aug 05)
- Re: nbase MD5 and SHA1 break static builds Philip Pickering (Aug 05)
