Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap and routing problems
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:25:15 -0700
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:25:30AM +0200, Peter Gordon wrote:
Here is the information you requested. As you can see, route -n is empty, as is /proc/net/route. "ip route" apparently does not write to /proc/net/route - on the other hand I don't know if or where it does write to.
I don't know yet how to deal with this. As a workaround you can try running Nmap with the --unprivileged option. That will use normal system calls to send packets, bypassing Nmap's normal route determination.
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2009-02-19 10:13 IST
Nmap 4.11 is pretty old but I don't think that's the problem here. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems kx (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems Peter Gordon (Feb 19)
- Re: nmap and routing problems David Fifield (Feb 18)
