Nmap Development mailing list archives

anyone aware of this?


From: mike <dmciscobgp () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:31:10 +0000


to all:
 
not sure if this has ever been brought up. i have read everywhere that you cannot scan yourself via loopback on windows 
because of the windows ip/stack anomoly. i have been testing this on my machine (XP/SP2) and have found that, yes you 
CAN scan loopback but ONLY with a full connect() -sT scan. you will have some ports show up as filtered if you set your 
time delay to high. if you set it to slow you will get open live ports to respond with the appropriate syn-ack and the 
closed ports will have a "connection-refused". when packet-trace option is present, you will see something along the 
lines of this as output:
 
CONN (1.3400's) TCP localhost > 127.0.0.1:135 => Unknown error
 
i am at a different machine and can't copy the full output at the moment, so i am simply showing the packet IS sent. 
the syn-ack was received for 135 tcp being open on my scan test. like i said, not sure if this was ever made aware to 
anyone
 
 
also, i wanted to ask if this is next idea is either implemented now or will be in the future (is it needed?) as we 
know, most UDP services must usually have a protocol thrown at it for us to get some data back (and mainly it has to be 
the EXACT protocol in many cases). there are services such as IPSEC and RIP that will only speak to you if the source 
port is the same as the destination. does nmap allow for this as a default behavior for it's scanning technique? if 
not, does anyone agree this should be added? why not just have the default behavior for nmap (at least when it comes to 
a UDP scan) simply set the source port to match the destination? at least then, when pushing data, you will at least be 
adherring to the rules these ports speak and are looking for. this would be almost a guarantee of us getting something 
back. i understand we have scripts in place, but that is mainly after-the-fact. i want to be able to set out a simple 
scan and have my source ports match whatever destination i am probing. if not in making this a full feature static 
wise, someone should at least allow the option to be present to users, i feel
 
thank you for hearing my thoughts


m|ke
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pc-scout/default.aspx?CBID=wl&ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_pcscout:102009
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: