
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ncat --max-conns
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 04:57:50 +0400
This is a correction to my own posting from a couple of days ago. The "alternative" get_conn_count() function below: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:52:00AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
Alternatively: static int get_conn_count(void) { unsigned int conn_count; do { conn_dec_changed = 0; conn_count = conn_inc - conn_dec; if (conn_inc < conn_dec && !conn_dec_changed); return -1; // error, counts got out of sync } while (conn_dec_changed); return conn_count; }
is not correct in that it "forgets" about the wraparounds of conn_inc and conn_dec possibly being legitimate (for a long-living process) as it was suggested earlier in that posting. The first version of get_conn_count() given in the posting (with the check against INT_MAX) is wraparound-compatible, and thus it should be preferred. INT_MAX may be replaced with some smaller number (if another upper limit is known). Alexander _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: ncat --max-conns venkat sanaka (Oct 03)
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 05)
- Re: ncat --max-conns Solar Designer (Oct 05)
- Re: ncat --max-conns Solar Designer (Oct 07)
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 07)
- Re: ncat --max-conns venkat sanaka (Oct 08)
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 09)
- Re: ncat --max-conns Solar Designer (Oct 09)
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 09)
- Re: ncat --max-conns Solar Designer (Oct 09)
- Re: ncat --max-conns Solar Designer (Oct 05)
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ncat --max-conns David Fifield (Oct 09)