Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault
From: Gunnar Lindberg <Gunnar.Lindberg () chalmers se>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:48:33 +0100 (MET)
Thanks for the idea of /etc/resolv.conf - we're one step forward:
search cdg.chalmers.se nomad.chalmers.se chalmers.se
nameserver 129.16.1.53
nameserver 129.16.2.53
nameserver 2001:6b0:2:1::53
nameserver 2001:6b0:2:2::53
If I comment out the two IPv6 resolver addresses nmap-5.20 works OK.
My 0.01 SEK is that something goes wrong when trying to make use of struct sockaddr_storage * in get_dns_servers() and that that later on leads to corrupt data.
I'm not entirely sure, but I think "sockaddr_storage" is some kind if
"generic data struckture for all IP".
nmap-5.00/nmap_dns.cc:
get_dns_servers()
...
serverList.push_back(inet_ntoa((*servI)->addr.sin_addr))
nmap-5.20/nmap_dns.cc:
get_dns_servers()
...
serverList.push_back(inet_socktop((struct sockaddr_storage *) &(*servI)->addr));
And, NB, it's an x86_64 machine, 64 bit. These seem to turn several
things upside down - I've been hit several times when porting
ancient network software.
Maybe RedHat missed things in some x86_64 include file (I installed
g++ via "yum install gcc-c++" and got
Installed: gcc-c++.x86_64 0:4.1.2-46.el5_4.2
Dependency Installed: libstdc++-devel.x86_64 0:4.1.2-46.el5_4.2
g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
Or just that nmap-5.20 needs to include another file that will help
instruct that "sizeof(int) > 32".
I'll see to the valgring thing in a few days - RedHat don't provide
that by default so I probably have to install it myself.
Gunnar
From bmenrigh () ucsd edu Sun Jan 24 11:30:36 2010
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
To: Gunnar Lindberg <gunnar.lindberg () chalmers se>
CC: "nmap-dev () insecure org" <nmap-dev () insecure org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:31:09 +0100
Subject: Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault
Message-ID: <20100124103109.4e79133a () spoke wan>
References: <201001221632.o0MGWA9U018170 () grunert cdg chalmers se>
<20100124101503.0f902ce1 () spoke wan>
In-Reply-To: <20100124101503.0f902ce1 () spoke wan>
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:15:03 +0000 or thereabouts Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu> wrote:On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:32:10 +0100 (MET) or thereabouts Gunnar Lindberg <Gunnar.Lindberg () chalmers se> wrote:./nmap 129.16.x.y Starting Nmap 5.20 Segmentation fault[...snip...]
Hi Gunnar, I have not been able to reproduce this issue. I have tried having[...snip...]
Gunnar,
It just occurred to me that this maybe be a completely different issue. In the past we've had some issues with make not catching some changes in libraries like changes the included dnet that cause strange issues like this. It looks like you're working out of a directory you compiled from source.
Go ahead and do a "make distclean" and then a "./configure" and then "make" to see if the issue is resolved.
Brandon
From bmenrigh () ucsd edu Sun Jan 24 11:14:32 2010
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
To: Gunnar Lindberg <gunnar.lindberg () chalmers se>
CC: "nmap-dev () insecure org" <nmap-dev () insecure org>, "bmenrigh () ucsd edu"
<bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:15:03 +0100
Subject: Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault
Message-ID: <20100124101503.0f902ce1 () spoke wan>
References: <201001221632.o0MGWA9U018170 () grunert cdg chalmers se>
In-Reply-To: <201001221632.o0MGWA9U018170 () grunert cdg chalmers se>
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:32:10 +0100 (MET) or thereabouts Gunnar Lindberg <Gunnar.Lindberg () chalmers se> wrote:
./nmap 129.16.x.y Starting Nmap 5.20 Segmentation fault ./nmap -n 129.16.x.y OK # uname -a Linux wilfer.cdg.chalmers.se 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 30 18:35:28 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5.4 (Tikanga) gdb backtrace #0 0x00000000004692dd in nmap_mass_rdns_core (targets=0x1742ac00, num_targets=1) at nmap_dns.cc:1160 #1 0x0000000000469e06 in nmap_mass_rdns (targets=0x1742acc0, num_targets=1) at nmap_dns.cc:1315 #2 0x00000000004232d6 in nexthost (hs=0x1742a820, exclude_group=0x0, ports=0x7fffb07dfa70, pingtype=122) at targets.cc:582 #3 0x000000000041ec29 in nmap_main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffb07e2e38) at nmap.cc:1720 #4 0x000000000041a799 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffb07e2e38) at main.cc:205 I added some printf() nmap-5.20/nmap_dns.cc: static void nmap_mass_rdns_core(Target **targets, int num_targets) { ... fprintf(stderr, "1a *targets=<%X>\n",*targets); init_servs(); fprintf(stderr, "1b *targets=<%X>\n",*targets); ... Result: 1a *targets=<135A5CD0> 1b *targets=<0> My 0.01 SEK is that something goes wrong when trying to make use of struct sockaddr_storage * in get_dns_servers() and that that later on leads to corrupt data. Gunnar Lindberg, Chalmers University of Technology
Hi Gunnar,
I have not been able to reproduce this issue. I have tried having Nmap lookup a few hundred thousand random IPs. I then switched to looking up all the names in your 129.16.0.0/16 but that worked several times using several different nameservers too.
I even ran in valgrind to check for memory and other issues:
$ sudo valgrind -v --gen-suppressions=all --db-attach=yes ./nmap --noninteractive -sL -v -d --dns-servers ns1.chalmers.se 129.16.0.0/16
Are you able to reproduce the error? If so, what is in your /etc/resolve.conf?
If you can, run Nmap in valgrind to see if that reports anything interesting.
Regards,
Brandon
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Gunnar Lindberg (Jan 23)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 24)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Gunnar Lindberg (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Gunnar Lindberg (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 24)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Kris Katterjohn (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Kris Katterjohn (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Gunnar Lindberg (Jan 26)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Kris Katterjohn (Jan 26)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault David Fifield (Jan 27)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 24)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Brandon Enright (Jan 25)
- Re: nmap-5.20 on x86_64 Segmentation fault Gunnar Lindberg (Jan 25)
