Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:47:25 -0700
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:14:35PM +0100, vladz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:48:54PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:I might come up with a patch some other day, but since I am not an expert in C, maybe you can.Thanks. I looked at the resume code and it's kind of tricky. If you some up with a patch we'd appreciate seeing it.Here is a small patch that provides following improvements (bug fixes) when "--resume" option is called with a normal output file (previously generated with "-oN"): 1) When parsing file, search for nmap header string "Nmap scan report for" instead of "Interesting ports on" (cf. previous post in the current thread). 2) Find later IP by using the string "Nmap scan report on *" where "*" can be "hostname (ip_addr)" or "ip_addr" depending on whether DNS reverse lookup occured or not.
It looks good to me! I committed it as r16935. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails Till Maas (Jan 12)
- Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails David Fifield (Feb 26)
- Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails vladz (Mar 03)
- Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails vladz (Mar 05)
- Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails David Fifield (Mar 05)
- Re: BUG: resume for Host without open ports and failed reverse DNS lookup fails David Fifield (Feb 26)
