Re: [NSE] qscan first read timeout value too short?

[David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>]

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:02:29PM -0600, David Fifield wrote:
> I think it also makes sense to move the unconditional read in
> l_ncap_pcap_register. I'll do that if it doesn't look like it will cause
> problems.

Looking at this more closely, it appears that the code is a little
tricky, reading packets in advance and keeping them ready for when a
user-requested read comes in. I'm not going to mess with it now.

David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/