Re: NSEC Enumeration script

[John Bond <john.r.bond () gmail com>]

On 25 March 2011 10:22, John Bond <john.r.bond () gmail com> wrote:
> > Why did you have to define any ANY (type 255) decoder? Is this
> > compatible with other potential uses of ANY outside of DNSSEC?
> TBH i dont think i use it anywhere anymore do i.  i played around with
> using different types in the enumerate script to see if it made any
> difference.  I didn't notice anything.  Although it is nice to have
> and could probably be put to better use in scripts like
> dns-cache-snoop.  i.e. if you are trying to get as much information as
> possible from a dns server then any is the best way to do it.  However
> i think it can be removed as i dont think im using it
>
> Well i am away on training course next week so not sure if i will have
> a chance to look at this until the week after but let me know if you
> have any further questions
Acutely forget that i have just sat looking at this function for the
last 10 minutes trying to work out why i wrote it until i noticed that
i had just copy and pasted the SRV decoder and not done anything else
with it other then a sed '/SRV/ANY/' .  The any decoder will or should
never get called and can be removed all the ANY logic is done in the
findNiceAnswer function that you comment on above
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/