
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: GSOC 2012
From: SAI LAKSHMI Bhavana <oslbhavana () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:49:36 +0530
Hello Sir, Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions and ideas. Sorry for the delay to reply. It is true that it would be easier to implement and test for proxy in Nsock rather than a port scan. My idea is to make a TCP connection to a http proxy using nsock_connect_tcp(), creating a new ms_event. Then send a Connect request to the proxy regarding the target to be scanned using the standard send(). A successful reply(200 CONNECTION ESTABLISHED) is expected for a open port otherwise its marked closed. If the proxy is a part of chain proxy then the request will be forwarded accordingly by the proxies itself. I would be pleased if told more about the implementations regarding chain proxy. I think for a socks 5 proxy a connection can be made with the server and the details about authentication are further sent either by the details provided by the user or any default values. Then a TCP stream connection request can be sent and the reply is analysed. The errors can be handled accordingly . Suggestions are most welcomed :) _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- GSoC 2012 Zisis Sialveras (Feb 09)
- Re: GSoC 2012 David Fifield (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- GSOC 2012 SAI LAKSHMI Bhavana (Mar 20)
- Re: GSOC 2012 David Fifield (Mar 20)
- Re: GSOC 2012 SAI LAKSHMI Bhavana (Mar 22)
- Re: GSOC 2012 David Fifield (Mar 22)
- Re: GSOC 2012 SAI LAKSHMI Bhavana (Mar 29)
- Re: GSOC 2012 David Fifield (Mar 29)
- Re: GSOC 2012 David Fifield (Mar 20)