Nmap Development mailing list archives
bug or host evasive action?
From: Britton Kerin <britton.kerin () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:22:33 -0800
Hi guys,
I guess any weirdness you see as a result of scans could be hosts
taking evasive action or something, but this strikes me as weird.
When I skip host detection, the http server on one of the Linksys
wireless routers gets found, but not if I don't:
$ nmap -Pn 192.168.1.1
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-04-19 20:19 AKDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.1
Host is up (0.0061s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.68 seconds
$ nmap 192.168.1.1
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-04-19 20:19 AKDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.1
Host is up (0.012s latency).
All 1000 scanned ports on 192.168.1.1 are closed
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 7.57 seconds
Scanning the entire network also finds the http port:
$ nmap 192.168.1.0/24
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-04-19 20:02 AKDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.1
Host is up (0.0044s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.25
Host is up (0.029s latency).
Not shown: 995 closed ports
[snip other hosts]
Is the router maybe hiding because it just got discovered or something,
or could this be some sort of nmap bug?
Thanks,
Britton Kerin
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- bug or host evasive action? Britton Kerin (Apr 19)
- Re: bug or host evasive action? Daniel Miller (Apr 19)
