Re: http-userdir-enum script name

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

Renaming scripts tends to be difficult, because people quite frequently update their script directory and wind up with 
two copies of the script. Renaming it twice means they might wind up with three copies. 

Ron

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:25:21 +0300 Toni Ruottu <toni.ruottu () iki fi> wrote:
> Could we name it http-prevuln-cve2001-1013 to give clear indication it
> needs porting?
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Hani Benhabiles <kroosec () gmail com>
> wrote:
> > On 06/11/2012 12:03 PM, Toni Ruottu wrote:
> > >   People,
> > >
> > > I almost filed http-vuln-cve2001-1013 to the script idea page, but
> > > then I noticed that it already exists under name http-userdir-enum.
> > > See http://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/http-userdir-enum.html Is there
> > > a reason why some vulnerability scripts are named after a cve while
> > > others are named by the task they perform?
> > >
> > >   --Toni
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> > > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> > > Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
> >
> > Hi Toni,
> >
> > Those that are not named (yet), need to be ported to vulns library
> > as they were written before we had it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hani.
> >
> > --
> > Hani Benhabiles
> >
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/kroosec
> > Blog: http://kroosec.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/