Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments

[Aleksandar Nikolic <nikolic.alek () gmail com>]

Sorry for the late reply.
Apparently my ISP thought I won't be needing
Internet connection this weekend...


> done with the brute.firstonly parameter.
>
> Also, what do you mean by "quite some time"? If you detect this
> behavior (pcAnywhere implementation) and if this value is always the
> same between versions, then your code could just sleep() for this
> duration? Or is there a need for an active sleep(<short time>) and
> retry cycle?

In my tests, it the time needed to wait wasn't constant. So this
wait-and-retry cycle seemed like a best option.

I'll do some cosmetic fixes and, if there are no objections, will
commit the script later today.

Aleksandar
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/