
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature?
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:22:49 -0700
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 06:58:33PM +0200, John Bond wrote:
On 15 September 2012 17:04, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:Thanks, I applied it. I stripped out the set_port_version("hardmatched") changed because those are unnecessary. I also didn't apply this hunk; can you explain it and tell me what to put in the commit message?Cheers and yes, basically the status page changed or i got it wrong in the first place. i don't have an old version of the software so haven't been able to confirm which it is. however the uri needed in the current version of the software is "/rs-status"
I just applied this in r29823. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 12)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 15)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 18)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? David Fifield (Sep 13)
- Re: [NSE] Dual-stack (IPv4/6) bug/feature? John Bond (Sep 13)