
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files
From: starlight.2012q3 () binnacle cx
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:45:37 -0400
FYI I did eventually get that scan of the China evilhost completed. It took three days and in the end was fairly boring --almost seems like it was specifically designed as an 'nmap' tarpit. The socket count went up to 200k by the time the scan was complete. Seems to me this might be a socket leak as each script run appears to never clean up the socket allocated for it. If the sockets are kept for valid reasons, then 'nmap' should advise users to increase the 'ulimit' for file descriptors on exhaustion events. I'm also still wondering if --send-eth activity should not all occur on a single raw/packet socket with response traffic dispatched internally by 'nmap'. _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Socket troubles: Too many open files Christopher Clements (Sep 12)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Henri Doreau (Sep 13)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Christopher Clements (Sep 14)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 14)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 20)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files starlight . 2012q3 (Sep 20)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 20)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Christopher Clements (Sep 14)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 20)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Patrick Donnelly (Sep 20)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 21)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Patrick Donnelly (Sep 21)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files David Fifield (Sep 21)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Henri Doreau (Sep 13)
- Re: Socket troubles: Too many open files Henri Doreau (Sep 21)