Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003
From: rirong zhu <zyrdyx () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:02:17 +0800
Are you sure that the IP address is not an address used by localhost?
What is the output of these commands?
nmap --route-dst 61.146.152.25
nmap --iflist
Ok,Here is the result: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> nmap --route-dst 61.146.152.25 61.146.152.25 lo0 lo0 srcaddr 115.236.23.45 nexthop 115.236.23.33 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-11-22 15:56 中国标准时间 WARNING: No targets were specified, so 0 hosts scanned. Nmap done: 0 IP addresses (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.23 seconds C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> nmap --iflist Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-11-22 15:56 中国标准时间 ************************INTERFACES************************ DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MTU MAC eth0 (eth0) 192.168.1.45/24 ethernet up 1500 78:2B:CB:14:95:81 eth1 (eth1) 115.236.23.45/29 ethernet up 1500 78:2B:CB:14:95:82 eth1 (eth1) 124.160.125.118/29 ethernet up 1500 78:2B:CB:14:95:82 lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/0 loopback up 1520 DEV WINDEVICE eth0 \Device\NPF_{AE6CFA87-7BCF-415B-AFA2-49A8B1ECFD83} eth1 \Device\NPF_{13AAE8F2-CF8A-4A93-847B-FAFE88D46F17} eth1 \Device\NPF_{13AAE8F2-CF8A-4A93-847B-FAFE88D46F17} lo0 <none> **************************ROUTES************************** DST/MASK DEV GATEWAY 255.255.255.255/32 eth1 115.236.23.45 124.255.255.255/32 eth1 115.236.23.45 115.236.23.45/32 lo0 127.0.0.1 115.255.255.255/32 eth1 115.236.23.45 255.255.255.255/32 eth0 192.168.1.45 124.160.125.118/32 lo0 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.45/32 lo0 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.255/32 eth0 192.168.1.45 124.160.125.112/29 eth1 124.160.125.118 115.236.23.32/28 eth1 115.236.23.45 192.168.1.0/24 eth0 192.168.1.45 127.0.0.0/8 lo0 127.0.0.1 224.0.0.0/4 eth1 115.236.23.45 224.0.0.0/4 eth0 192.168.1.45 0.0.0.0/0 lo0 115.236.23.33 and when I use ping to check the target,I got a reply: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 61.146.152.25 Pinging 61.146.152.25 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 61.146.152.25: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=54 Reply from 61.146.152.25: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=54 Reply from 61.146.152.25: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=54 Reply from 61.146.152.25: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=54 _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 20)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 20)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 22)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 22)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 23)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Jarett (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Jarett (Nov 30)
- RE: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Rob Nicholls (Nov 30)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 20)
