Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project

[Prakash Gamit <prakashgamit23 () gmail com>]

On Saturday 27 April 2013 12:20:37 AM IST, Daniel Miller wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 12:13 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:24:57PM +0530, Prakash Gamit wrote:
> > > $ nmap -p1234,5678,1111,4321 --top-ports 2 <ip-address>
> > > scans top two ports(1111,1234 in this case) of the list given with -p.
> > >
> > > see this thread => http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q3/382
> > I think that feature should be removed in favor of taking the union.
> As long as this is being reworked, the oft-requested "exclude-ports"
> option should probably be implemented. It's really the only reason
> that the old (undocumented) behavior is useful.
>
> Dan

Thank you for your reply.

I will add "exclude-ports" option in my proposal.
-- 
Prakash Gamit
B.Tech(IDD) IV year
Computer Science and Engineering Department
Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
India
Ph: +91-7830426149

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/