Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: [nmap-svn] r33103 - in nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration: . libpcre


From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:00:52 +0200

26/06/2014 15:55:37 Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>:
Hi Jacek,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jacek Wielemborek 
<d33tah () gmail com> wrote:
26/06/2014 19:37:40 commit-mailer () nmap org:
Author: devin
Date: Thu Jun 26 19:37:40 2014
New Revision: 33103

Log:
Merged changes from trunk

Modified:
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/   (props changed)
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/FPEngine.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/TargetGroup.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/idle_scan.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/libpcre/configure
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/main.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap-os-db
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap_amigaos.h
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap_ftp.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nse_openssl.cc  
   (contents,

props changed) nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/osscan2.cc

   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/output.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/scan_engine.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/service_scan.cc
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/tcpip.h
   nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/traceroute.cc

Hi Devin,

David once told me that it's not the best idea to do that.
This way you make the patch in your branch harder to read
and SVN would merge the trivial changes anyway. Unless
something is actually required by your branch, backporting
it is not a good idea.

AFAIK, the recommended branch workflow for SVN is to first sync
with trunk and then merge your branch into trunk. The svn book
still seems to says this [1]:

"What happens when you finally finish your work, though? Your
new feature is done, and you're ready to merge your branch
changes back to the trunk (so your team can enjoy the bounty
of your labor). The process is simple. First, bring your
branch into sync with the trunk again, just as you've been
doing all along[28]:"

Has something changed in SVN?

[1]
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.basicmergin
g.html

No idea, I never did that this way. According to my logs, I just 
entered the trunk directory and did svn merge <path to the 
branch> and it worked (it needs to be a SVN checkout though, not 
git-svn).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Current thread: