Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Surface pro 3 debug build
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:54:40 -0600
Peter, Thank you! Your help was invaluable in fixing this issue. I've committed the change in r34013, and it will be in the next beta/testing release, which should be coming soon. You can also see your credit in the CHANGELOG file. Dan On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com> wrote:
Dan,
I believe that everything works just fine after applying the fix. While
the error buffer contains some data, the function returns without an error.
From what I saw it seems that while enumerating the devices, wpcap
encounters an issue opening a device – writes stuff to errbuf, skips the
device and continues enumerating other devices.
After applying the fix I mentioned, everything seems to work just fine,
and I am actually able to run “nmap scanme.nmap.org” and get a meaningful
output.
p_ifaces contains two entries:
- p_ifaces 0x02c22f70
{next=0x02c21170 {next=0x00000000 <NULL> name=0x02c22c60
"\\Device\\NPF_{77524534-162F-4DAE-91EC-9093F61CFE6E}" ...}
...} pcap_if *
+ next 0x02c21170 {next=0x00000000 <NULL>
name=0x02c22c60 "\\Device\\NPF_{77524534-162F-4DAE-91EC-9093F61CFE6E}"
...} pcap_if *
+ name 0x02c30178
"\\Device\\NPF_{8506B6A6-4EE6-40B4-BA32-B20C01604203}" char *
+ description 0x02c22fa0 "Microsoft" char
*
+ addresses 0x02c301c8 {next=0x00000000
<NULL> addr=0x02c301f8 {sa_family=2 sa_data=0x02c301fa "" }
netmask=0x02c30290 {...} ...} pcap_addr *
flags 0 unsigned int
errbuf contains "failed to set hardware filter to non-promiscuous mode" –
as a result of wpcap trying to open that Wifi-Direct adapter and failing
pcap_findalldevs returned 0
That is an undocumented behaviour, but according to their documentation,
you should only check errbuf when the return value is -1. It does imply
that the errbuf should be empty otherwise, but does not implicitly state
that.
I think applying the fix does not break anything for existing users –
since I copied the code from a sample and seems to fix this issue. Also –
should there be any other error there (while pcap_findalldevs returns -1
and the errbuf is expected to be filled), having the errbuf set to NULL
most likely cause a similar crash.
As for treating this as warning – I would not bother checking the errbuf
when the function returns 0 (success), since it may or may not be used and
it may or may not contain meaningful data.
Peter
*From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2015 2:42 PM
*To:* Peter Malecka; Nmap-dev
*Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build
Peter,
Thanks so much! This is really helpful information. Unfortunately, it
still looks like this ends up making Nmap unusable on this platform, since
we just traded a crash (worst) for a fatal error (still bad). Can you see,
while you debug, whether the pcap_if_t structures (pcapdevs and p_ifaces)
have any valid content in them after pcap_findalldevs returns with error
status? In other words, can we treat this error as a warning ("Can't
enumerate all interfaces" or something) and still make do with the
interfaces that *are* supported? It's a long shot, but might be worthwhile
to check.
Dan
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com>
wrote:
Daniel,
I poked around wpcap source, compiled it from soruce and debugged some
more.
I found a possible issue there. When those wpcap functions are called,
they sometimes have the errbuf argument set to null. The documentation does
not state that the argument can be null.
http://www.tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_findalldevs.3pcap.html
I tried fixing this issue for the --iflist command, and succeeded. I had
to fix it in these 2 places:
intf-win32.c
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
if (pcap_findalldevs(&pcapdevs, errbuf) == -1) {
intf_close(intf);
return (-1);
}
tcpip.cc
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
if ((pcap_findalldevs(&p_ifaces, errbuf)) == -1) {
fatal("pcap_findalldevs() : Cannot retrieve pcap interfaces");
return NULL;
}
Note the new errbuf variable and how it is used in the pcap_findalldevs
function instead of a null argument. There might be more places where this
causes issues.
On a sidenote: it was failing on the Microsoft Wifi direct virtual
adapter. See attached the callstack from winpcap debug (crash on strncpy to
an empty errbuf).
Hope it helps.
Peter
*From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 5, 2015 11:17 PM
*To:* Peter Malecka
*Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build
Peter,
Thank you so much! I will see what I can do from here.
Dan
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com>
wrote:
Hi Dan,
I followed your instructions and ran the debugger in vs2013 (nmap
--iflist).
Please find attached all the output I could generate now.
In the callstack.txt, there is the line and details of the wpcap call that
failed (pcap_findalldevs(&p_ifaces, NULL)), the rest is wpcap debug
output. I cannot see any deeper without the wpcap pdb.
Hope it helps,
Peter
*From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 5, 2015 6:02 PM
*To:* Peter Malecka
*Cc:* dmiller () nmap org
*Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build
Peter,
Thanks for offering to help. I've gotten several offers, but no follow-up.
We really need a backtrace of the actual call that fails. Anything you can
provide beyond that would be great, too. You can get the debug package
here: <snip>
There are bug reporting instructions on WinPcap's web site which will
probably help to create better debug output:
http://www.winpcap.org/bugs.htm
Thanks!
Dan
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com>
wrote:
Hi Dan,
While looking at this issue on github (
https://github.com/nmap/nmap/issues/15 ), I found that you might be
looking for people to help you debug new builds.
Let me know if I can help.
Best,
Peter
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Daniel Miller (Feb 12)
- RE: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter Malecka (Feb 12)
- Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Daniel Miller (Feb 12)
- RE: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter Malecka (Feb 12)
