Re: Nmap 6.47 works incorrectly in Solaris 10

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

Luong,

Sorry about the long silence. I've filed this as a bug report on our
tracker: http://issues.nmap.org/124

One thing I notice about the output you gave me: The hosts that Solaris
*is* able to detect all have Oracle or VMware OUIs (MAC address vendor),
whereas the Linux scanner sees hosts with Cisco, HP, Dell, etc. Are these
targets Solaris machines, too? If so, are any Solaris machines missed by
the Solaris scanner?

Apart from Nmap, are you able to contact (ping, ssh, or anything) the
missed hosts from the Solaris machine?

Thanks for any further details you can add.

Dan

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Luong Nguyen <lucasart1989 () gmail com> wrote:

> 1. Output of nmap --version
> bash-3.2# ./nmap -v
>
> Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-04-02 21:57 EDT
> Read data files from: .
> WARNING: No targets were specified, so 0 hosts scanned.
> Nmap done: 0 IP addresses (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.19 seconds
>            Raw packets sent: 0 (0B) | Rcvd: 0 (0B)
>
>
> 2. Output of your command with -d
> attach file
>
> 3. Can nmap find the missing hosts if scanning them individually? Like if
> 192.168.89.10 is shown in the Linux scan, on Solaris do: nmap -sn -d
> 192.168.89.10
> attach file
>
> 4. Is there anything special or unique about your system or network? Are
> you running as root, or in a zone, or on a VM?
> I run all command with root user
> SunOS qipsun34 5.10 Generic_147147-26 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210
> all hosts connected to a switch no firewall
>
> 5. Does the problem persist with the latest development tree in
> subversion? svn co https://svn.nmap.org/nmap
> Yes
>
> Thanks,
> Luong Nguyen
>
> 2015-04-02 15:28 GMT-04:00 Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>:
>
> Luong,
> > Thanks for bringing this up. We have several fixes in our development
> > source tree for issues on Solaris, but none with the symptom you described.
> > Can you provide some more information so we can debug?
> >
> > 1. Output of nmap --version
> >
> > 2. Output of your command with -d
> >
> > 3. Can nmap find the missing hosts if scanning them individually? Like if
> > 192.168.89.10 is shown in the Linux scan, on Solaris do: nmap -sn -d
> > 192.168.89.10
> >
> > 4. Is there anything special or unique about your system or network? Are
> > you running as root, or in a zone, or on a VM?
> >
> > 5. Does the problem persist with the latest development tree in
> > subversion? svn co https://svn.nmap.org/nmap
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Luong Nguyen <lucasart1989 () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dev,
> > >
> > > I using nmap6.47 for testing in Solaris 10.
> > > Run command: nmap -sP 192.168.89.0/24
> > > But it only detect 4 hosts up on my subnet
> > > On Linux, nmap detects 60 hosts up on same subnet.
> > >
> > > Could you please help to check this issue?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Luong Nguyen.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the dev mailing list
> > > https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> > > Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/