Re: [RFC] smb-check-vulns port to nse vulns lib

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com> wrote:

> W dniu 25.06.2015 o 14:51, Daniel Miller pisze:
> > Andrew,
> >
> >
> > A single script can have multiple vuln tables, and return them all in a
> > single report. However, I would not choose to do that for this script.
> >
> > A few days ago, I added an enhancement request #171, "Split
> smb-check-vulns
> > into separate smb-vuln-msXX-XXX.nse scripts". This would allow users to
> > check for specific issues by name, not by "danger" or "safety" of the
> > check. We can use categories to control which checks are run: safe,
> > intrusive, and dos are relevant to this sort of check. For the Conficker
> > infection check, we can use the malware category, too.
> >
> > Dan
>
> This sounds like Andrew's task should split in two then. The way I
> understand it, he only has this (and perhaps one more?) script to
> convert before he's done porting non-vulns scripts to vulns library.
> Does this mean he should skip this one and perhaps split it later or
> port it as well and leave splitting for later?

I would go ahead with the simpler conversions, then mark #147 done with a
comment mentioning #171 as a separate task. Also, I would consider this
lower priority than the Nsock proxy work that he is doing, which is central
to his GSoC project.

Dan

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/