Nmap Development mailing list archives
Bug report? nmap seems to sometimes omit results for no apparent reason...
From: Peter Valdemar Mørch <peter () morch com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 04:43:21 +0200
Hi, Periodically, we issue nmap -oG - -PE --send-ip -sU -p 161 -iL <file> We se that the list of hosts discovered vary quite a bit from run to run. I've started a tshark/wireshark trace focussing on a particular host, and I can't see the difference between scans where a particular host is included and those where the host is omitted. When it is included, it first does an ICMP ping that succeeds, then an ARP(?), followed by a bogus SNMPv3 request. When omitted, an ICMP ping that succeeds, then an ARP(?). But no SNMPv3 request. I don't see why not. (When nmap reports a particular host as supporting SNMP, our application does an SNMPv2 get on sysName.0 and 3 other OIDs - so that isn't from nmap). Can anybody see why nmap decides not to report some hosts sometimes? Sincerely, Peter ******************** Details: ******************** https://gist.github.com/pmorch/95d240ade96228468ed2 is a github gist containing: * included-13:25:06.nmap.txt * omitted-13:30:06.nmap.txt * host172.22.216.18.pcap An nmap is run every 5 minutes using params like above. We've focused on 172.22.216.18, which is omitted from the results ca. once or twice every 24 hours using The hosts are scanned using an -iL <file> containing a list of IPs corresponding to 172.22.216.0/24 included-13:25:06.nmap.txt shows a run where 172.22.216.18 was included and 5 minutes later omitted-13:30:06.nmap.txt shows a run where it was omitted. As can be seen from the difference between included-*.txt and omitted-*.txt, the lists of hosts that are reported differ significantly between runs. Even though the scans where done on a Sunday, and I'm quite sure nobody was messing with network settings during the weekend. I did however, only focus on a single host in my analysis. The tshark was run like so: tshark -w host172.22.216.18.pcap -f host 172.22.216.18. This is all done on a local ethernet network. -- Peter Valdemar Mørch http://www.morch.com
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Bug report? nmap seems to sometimes omit results for no apparent reason... Peter Valdemar Mørch (Aug 23)
