
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Reg: Clarification of my question
From: Dario Ciccarone <dciccaro () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:09:22 -0500
I gave a networking primer - I didn't focus on IPv4 vs IPv6. So you would have a new option - "nmap -sM", for "ML scan". Which would then proceed to invoke magic(), and based on what magic() returns, it would choose UDP or TCP (wondering why limiting to those two protocols) as L4, and I also assume will choose the ports. Can you pseudocode magic() for us ? What would be the inputs into it? The outputs, we kind of figure out. How would it build a decision tree to decide what the output should be ? On 1/11/17 11:04 AM, Akash Das wrote:
Dear dario, I think you got the question wrong. I just wanted to ask that a new feature can also be added which will choose which connection to use TCP or UDP . I am not at all talking about IPv4 and IPv6 here. I was just suggesting that instead of specifying everytime which type of connection to use I just wanted to say on the basis of the network architecture can there be an option which chooses the best type of connection either UDP or TCP. We can introduce ML into this concept also. I think you got my question wrong. Thanks for replying, With Regards, -- /*Akash Das */ /*Student Systems admin */ /*Indian Institute Of Information Technology */ /*Sricity*/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Reg: Clarification of my question Akash Das (Jan 11)
- Re: Reg: Clarification of my question Dario Ciccarone (Jan 11)
- Re: Reg: Clarification of my question Daniel Miller (Jan 11)
- Re: Reg: Clarification of my question Akash Das (Jan 11)