Nmap Development mailing list archives
possibly a bug or MS voodoo
From: "Schmidt, Nathanael via dev" <dev () nmap org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:15:39 +0000
Hello developer,
i have following Problem. I try to ping scan my local network using nmap, but it doesn't seem to find machines that are
for sure alive. It responses to Windows ping but not to nmap ping scan. I searched the problem in the internet. I don't
found a solution.
Results for ping (Transleted from German) :
Ping is executed for 172.27.97.21 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.27.97.21: Bytes=32 Time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 172.27.97.21: Bytes=32 Time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 172.27.97.21: Bytes=32 Time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 172.27.97.21: Bytes=32 Time<1ms TTL=127
Ping statistics for 172.27.97.21:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0.
(0% loss),
Approx. times in millisec:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Mean = 0ms
Results for Ping Capture:
921 18:51:13 11.10.2021 9.7150826 (2096) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Request Message, From 194.113.123.243 To 172.27.97.21
922 18:51:13 11.10.2021 9.7158972 (16876) 172.27.97.21 194.113.123.243
ICMP ICMP:Echo Reply Message, From 172.27.97.21 To 194.113.123.243
962 18:51:14 11.10.2021 10.7188766 (2096) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Request Message, From 194.113.123.243 To 172.27.97.21
963 18:51:14 11.10.2021 10.7192058 (0) 172.27.97.21 194.113.123.243
ICMP ICMP:Echo Reply Message, From 172.27.97.21 To 194.113.123.243
1034 18:51:15 11.10.2021 11.7228086 (2096) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Request Message, From 194.113.123.243 To 172.27.97.21
1035 18:51:15 11.10.2021 11.7233874 (0) 172.27.97.21 194.113.123.243 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Reply Message, From 172.27.97.21 To 194.113.123.243
1098 18:51:16 11.10.2021 12.7274641 (2096) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Request Message, From 194.113.123.243 To 172.27.97.21
1099 18:51:16 11.10.2021 12.7278742 (0) 172.27.97.21 194.113.123.243 ICMP
ICMP:Echo Reply Message, From 172.27.97.21 To 194.113.123.243
Results for nmap -sn -PE:
Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 2.11 seconds
Results for nmap -sn -PE Capture:
562 19:47:06 11.10.2021 3.5983423 (11480) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21
TCP TCP: [Bad CheckSum]Flags=CE....S., SrcPort=59137, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=0, Seq=1643617409, Ack=0,
Win=8192 ( Negotiating scale factor 0x8 ) = 8192
715 19:47:07 11.10.2021 4.5985142 (11480) 194.113.123.243 172.27.97.21
TCP TCP: [Bad CheckSum]Flags=CE....S., SrcPort=59138, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=0, Seq=215975257, Ack=0,
Win=8192 ( Negotiating scale factor 0x8 ) = 8192
I don't can disable Checksum Offload. It is a production System. When they do need it. I'll have to sit down in the
evening and do that.
nmap -version
Nmap version 7.92 ( https://nmap.org )
Platform: i686-pc-windows-windows
Compiled with: nmap-liblua-5.3.5 openssl-1.1.1k nmap-libssh2-1.9.0 nmap-libz-1.2.11 nmap-libpcre-7.6 nmap-libdnet-1.12
ipv6
Windows Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
Where I'm most confused.
nmap -sn -PA 194.113.122.40
Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-10-28 11:54 Mitteleuropõische Sommerzeit
Nmap scan report for 194.113.122.40
Host is up (1.00s latency).
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.05 seconds
nmap -sn -PA 194.113.122.0/24
Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-10-28 11:54 Mitteleuropõische Sommerzeit
...
Nmap scan report for xxx (194.113.122.38)
Host is up (0.00s latency).
Nmap scan report for xxx (194.113.122.39)
Host is up (0.00s latency).
Nmap scan report for 194.113.122.44
Host is up (0.00s latency).
...
If you need any more information, feel free to write me.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Nathanael Schmidt
Fachgruppe RZ
T +49 351 857-1612 (Durchwahl)
nathanael.schmidt () dresden-it de
________________________________
Dresden-IT GmbH
Kleiststraße 10 c, 01129 Dresden
T +49 351 857-1500 (Zentrale)
F +49 351 857-1502
info () dresden-it de
https://www.dresden-it.de
[cid:image001.png@01D7CBF5.84A54A50]
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Ralf Weber | Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr. Peter Lames | Amtsgericht Dresden: HRB 20046
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- possibly a bug or MS voodoo Schmidt, Nathanael via dev (Nov 24)

