oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: mtr
From: Jonathan Smith <smithj () freethemallocs com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:50:39 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Buchholz wrote
| Secunia suggests [1] that 0.73 contains a fix. Did you find any
indication
| to that? The advisory mentions 0.72 as vulnerable, but it is also dated
| February 28. The last mtr was released on April 7, but it seems to me all
| changes are unrelated.
The issue was an insecure use of sprintf in split_redraw(). In 0.73,
uptream changed this to use snprintf, thus fixing the issue.
smithj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkgzjf4ACgkQCG91qXPaRekhhACeKPMka0sknIpsV4gtS1zojRl6
jKYAoIrwOd4pxgvxetx39dlJ4fhll2Su
=gZQa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- CVE request: mtr Jonathan Smith (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr Robert Buchholz (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr security curmudgeon (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr Jonathan Smith (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr Jonathan Smith (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr security curmudgeon (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr Steven M. Christey (May 20)
- Re: CVE request: mtr Robert Buchholz (May 20)
