oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading
From: Robert Buchholz <rbu () gentoo org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:10:55 +0200
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Ned Ludd wrote:
So for nearly every python based program you can simply dump *.so *.py *.pyc files just about anywhere on the file system where an admin might invoke python.
As I also pointed out in our bug [1], this only happens in two cases: (1) The interactive shell is used to run python code. (2) A python script resides inside an untrusted directory. What I expect to be the most common use case, running python code from /usr, or /home, is safe. Since all out-of-the-box software would be installed in directories that are not world-writable, I am tempted call (2) an error on the user side. Changing the behaviour of python in this manner would also break existing programs. Robert [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224925
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Python Unsafe Module Loading Ned Ludd (Jun 04)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Robert Buchholz (Jun 05)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Ned Ludd (Jun 05)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Florian Weimer (Jun 05)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Robert Buchholz (Jun 05)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Ned Ludd (Jun 05)
- Re: Python Unsafe Module Loading Robert Buchholz (Jun 05)
