oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request -- git
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:39 +0100
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:17:39 -0500 (EST) "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org> wrote:
Looks like they got texts mixed up. -5516 was given to git_search issue, and -5517 to git_snapshot and git_object issues (the idea was to use lower id for the issue fixed earlier). Btw, commitdiff links are correct, only texts need swapping.Fixed.
Good, looks better.
Can you also change "in 1.5.x" to "before 1.5.x" in both descriptions?Done (modulo CVE style).
Plus one extraneous version change ;). Description for -5516 is supposed to say "before 1.5.5" (as 1.5.5.0, but upstream does not seem to use trailing ".0"s in version strings) (I have not looked whether only 1.5.x were affected by this, this may possibly go back to older versions), one for -5517 should say "before 1.5.6". Version difference was the reason for split / assignment of 2 CVEs.
Their announcement mentions version 1.5.6.6, that should have both issues fixed (and -5916). They'll probably clarify what was their "old" version.If they're releasing 1.5.6.6, doesn't that suggest that maybe one of the issues were still present in 1.5.5?
Paragraph above should explain this. Additionally, they probably just bumped to upstream version that has all three (-5516, -5517, and -5916) issues fixed. Not sure what was their previous version though. HTH -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- CVE request -- git Florian Weimer (Jan 15)
- Re: CVE request -- git Florian Weimer (Jan 19)
- Re: CVE request -- git Tomas Hoger (Jan 20)
- Re: CVE request -- git Sebastian Krahmer (Jan 20)
- Re: CVE request -- git Tomas Hoger (Jan 20)
- Re: CVE request -- git Sebastian Krahmer (Jan 20)
- Re: CVE request -- git Tomas Hoger (Jan 20)
- Re: CVE request -- git Florian Weimer (Jan 19)
- Re: CVE request -- git Tomas Hoger (Jan 21)
- Re: CVE request -- git Steven M. Christey (Jan 22)
- Re: CVE request -- git Tomas Hoger (Jan 23)
