oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: LZW decompression issues
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:41:53 +0400
Tomas - On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Tomas Hoger wrote:
Let me try to explain some.
Thank you! This is very helpful.
Do we possibly want to add the "maxbits < 12" check as well? And does it matter for security?I'm not aware of any security impact of that. Not sure if there's any spec that requires maxbits >= 12, if not, INIT_BITS (9) may be a safer lower bound.
I am asking Joerg about it in another message. Colin - thank you for your prompt response (redirecting us to NetBSD). Some further postings went without CC to you, I hope that's OK. Alexander
Current thread:
- LZW decompression issues Tomas Hoger (Aug 10)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Colin Percival (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Tomas Hoger (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Tavis Ormandy (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 28)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Tomas Hoger (Sep 29)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Tim Zingelman (Sep 29)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Joerg Sonnenberger (Sep 29)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 29)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Tavis Ormandy (Sep 29)
- Re: LZW decompression issues Solar Designer (Sep 28)
