CVE Request -- wireshark: wnpa-sec-2012-08, wnpa-sec-2012-09, wnpa-sec-2012-10

[Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov () redhat com>]

Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,

  the following recent Wireshark upstream advisories:

A) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-08.html

   References (upstream bugs and Red Hat bugzilla entry):
   [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6805 (802.11)
   [2] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7118 (802.3)
   [3] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7119 (ANSIMAP)
   [4] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 (ASF)
   [5] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7121 (BACAPP)
   [6] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7122 (HCIEVT)
   [7] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7124 (LTP)
   [8] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7125 (R3)
   [9] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824411

B) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-09.html

   References:
   [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7138
   [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824413

C) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-10.html

   References:
   [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7221
   [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824419

doesn't seem to have CVE identifiers yet.

Could you allocate three of them?

Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team