
oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse)
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:33:36 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2013 11:17 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello everyone, mysecureshell [1] is an SFTP-only shell to be used with sshd. The latest release 1.31 makes use of shared memory to maintain 128 slots with one struct for each connection/process. Access to that block of shared memory is not (or not properly) synchronized, so two or more processes might end up occupying the very same slot when process scheduling wants that to happen. The effective permissions of the process remain untouched, though. So it's logging in as someone else and it isn't. The relevant code from SftpServer/SftpWho.c (lines 106 and after) is: for (i = 0; i < SFTPWHO_MAXCLIENT; i++) if (who[i].status == SFTPWHO_EMPTY) { (void) usleep(100); if (who[i].status == SFTPWHO_EMPTY) { //clean all old infos memset(&who[i], 0, sizeof(*who)); //marked structure as occuped :) who[i].status = SFTPWHO_IDLE; return (&who[i]); } } The symptoms of this bug have been reported earlier at [2] by forum user "voleg". To my best knowledge, there is no CVE number assigned yet. Best, Sebastian [1] http://mysecureshell.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://mysecureshell.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?id=655
To reiterate: so I can confirm CVE assignments, and prevent duplicate assignments you *MUST* provide links to the code commits/vulnerable code. I don't have the time to go hunting through your source code for them. People need to start making better CVE requests, or you're not going to get CVEs from me. - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR8OLgAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTmREQAJqIQ4SB9RtJ0G5N47vtHdij Dp0T2Nq0wQU+NPDXvk9V0xUrTIorNb0L0MIf+VrCMDce1ipIns4GO7ru2P6Fyxyq plTbQHGfhsJh0sUDW8DrX2ZQmR6hLor++gBM5a7qE5nmXuy9SBJwwVbM79aiGyCt PQpXdkvBhkn1yzhM/THiZEXU0ZaqwRwn3ny8TIJJCNuz5nqoiiYRSoXz8+EHztUC pV8dnNZYR7VLBLduialEhlm6fjKIYj/IGvBQ3nRLuvgeqhT1T5pnd/kLbniY+8x7 sH/ShQA6ORlx9h+j6JNOjd8QT7Tc7KLdiIjoGXwCzBAOR2kuZ7UIzvvc30DyeoEG 8VghYfBbDW9Y2FM+roVywl5SJ6rQjzd2vzPYpd+VAadY9E8NLaXNBmE049IhX4ct 4VXv1KY70uz9J8RNnxTdJaWJt19n2zI+bXru55Btki0mKPNQ6HSJYWkawH0nab9B KJaMLX5KE4dJD16VmLD3jpIgnf6gK6Y7UvO6ERi5ThBIQ7s2JWggg4L6DCrata5a WyniqQC/TYLeBkrakPVQxnj5N854IfbbyjtocoEFueQi8jcKanIcyAeyliux3LY6 37kxhXJcalvsKsgGSwChIlBgimpkLchzzTkzstuz5BR+LjAvw0hGSOfzu2VFOzb8 UT4MLCwXSUmuwq77ESuM =2ar5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Sebastian Pipping (Jul 23)
- Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Sebastian Pipping (Jul 24)
- Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Kurt Seifried (Jul 25)
- Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Sebastian Pipping (Jul 25)
- Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Kurt Seifried (Jul 27)
- Re: CVE request: mysecureshell: information disclosure (or worse) Sebastian Pipping (Jul 25)