
oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan () mccme ru>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 01:50:53 +0300
On 2014-12-25 00:32, Gynvael Coldwind wrote:
You are aware that there is graphicsmagick which shares lots of code with im (it's an early fork)? It'd be nice to also report these issues to them if they apply. (I also reported a couple of issues in both im/gm lately and devs were always quick to fix things)Do you know if either im or gm backport fixes from each other? I fuzzed only im, so I've reported to im. I don't mind reporting to both in the future, but if they DO backport fixes, that would lead into collisions (i.e. two different fixes for one bug, makes merging harder).
I don't know about security fixes specifically but they have this in the FAQ:
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/FAQ.html#how-often-does-graphicsmagick-pick-up-new-code-from-imagemagickGraphicsMagick never picks up new code from ImageMagick as distributed by ImageMagick Studio LLC. [...]
-- Alexander Cherepanov
Current thread:
- Imagemagick fuzzing bug Bastien ROUCARIES (Dec 24)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Hanno Böck (Dec 24)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Gynvael Coldwind (Dec 24)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Alexander Cherepanov (Dec 24)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Gynvael Coldwind (Dec 25)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Gynvael Coldwind (Dec 24)
- Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug Hanno Böck (Dec 24)