
oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan () mccme ru>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:34:00 +0300
On 2014-11-23 12:24, Michal Zalewski wrote:
there's isoinfo (?!)
$ mkdir dir/ $ genisoimage -o empty.iso dir/ 2> /dev/null $ time zzuf -qcs: isoinfo -i empty.iso zzuf[s=48,r=0.004]: signal 11 (SIGSEGV) real 0m0.210s user 0m0.084s sys 0m0.008s :-) -- Alexander Cherepanov
Current thread:
- so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Michal Zalewski (Nov 23)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Hanno Böck (Nov 23)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Bernhard Hermann (Nov 23)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Alexander Cherepanov (Dec 11)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Alexander Cherepanov (Nov 23)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Lionel Debroux (Nov 23)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Michael Samuel (Nov 23)
- CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: [oss-security] so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)] Murray McAllister (Nov 24)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Alexander Cherepanov (Dec 11)
- Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument) Hanno Böck (Nov 23)