oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: ffmpeg afl bugs
From: cookieopfer () gmx net
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:59:13 +0200
Hi Hanno, so, in that case a the CVE should be rejected, with regard to the old CVE.
Hello,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 01:45:40 -0400 (EDT)
cve-assign () mitre org wrote:
overread end of atom 'stsd' by 4294967134 bytes
Use CVE-2016-7554.
I don't think this is any vuln.
This is a warning message from ffmpeg itself, not from any memory
safety tool. Thus I interpret this as "this file is garbled and would
overread if we'd do what the file offsets indicate".
It probably indicated a bug that Michal originally found with this
file, but that happened long ago. The file is from Dec 2014 (looks like
this [1]).
[1] https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2014-December/084342.html
--
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: hanno () hboeck de
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42
Attachment: _bin
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- ffmpeg afl bugs cookieopfer (Sep 25)
- Re: ffmpeg afl bugs Solar Designer (Sep 25)
- Re: ffmpeg afl bugs Michal Zalewski (Sep 25)
- Re: Re: ffmpeg afl bugs cookieopfer (Sep 25)
- Re: Re: ffmpeg afl bugs cookieopfer (Sep 26)
- Re: ffmpeg afl bugs Michal Zalewski (Sep 25)
- Re: ffmpeg afl bugs cve-assign (Sep 25)
- Re: Re: ffmpeg afl bugs Hanno Böck (Sep 26)
- Re: ffmpeg afl bugs Solar Designer (Sep 25)
