
oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety
From: Mats Wichmann <mats () wichmann us>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:51:49 -0700
On 11/7/24 14:41, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
As I'm sure you know, standards workgroups tend to operate in accordance with a charter that bounds their work. These vary widely depending on circumstances and the chartering organization(s), but it's not uncommon for projects - POSIX being one of those -to be set up to standardize existing practice to provide incentive for various implementations not to end up diverging from such practice without good reason. It's a little harsh to characterize operating in accordance with one's charter as "pretty unfortunate".So it standardizes behaviour as it exists in real life applications. (This is pretty unfortunate.)
Current thread:
- shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Solar Designer (Nov 05)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety David A. Wheeler (Nov 06)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 06)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Solar Designer (Nov 06)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 07)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 07)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Mats Wichmann (Nov 07)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 07)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Solar Designer (Nov 07)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 15)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Steffen Nurpmeso (Nov 06)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety David A. Wheeler (Nov 06)
- Re: shell wildcard expansion (un)safety Fay Stegerman (Nov 06)