
oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros
From: Bastian Blank <bblank () thinkmo de>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:53:07 +0200
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
The scope, which I assume was quoted from https://www.cve.org/PartnerInformation/ListofPartners/partner/Linux also lists cve () kernel org as the right email to contact.
This page also links as step one to https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/security-bugs.html, which does _not_ list cve () kernel org anywhere.
Note that this isn't just a technicality: for example, I'm a member of cve@k.o, but *NOT* of security@k.o.
But it already reached the right organisation. Did security@k.o respond with a referal? Bastian -- There are some things worth dying for. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Attila Szasz (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Sasha Levin (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Bastian Blank (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Sasha Levin (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Sasha Levin (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Jun 07)