oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros
From: nightmare.yeah27 () aceecat org
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 21:23:57 -0700
On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 07:45:08AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
The idea is that if triaging 13 bugs a day is unsustainable,
What do you mean by this? I never stated it was unsustainable, in fact it's just fine from our side. What is the problem you are wanting others to help in solving with here exactly?
I can guess Attila's meaning as an outsider. It seems strange to me that as one so deeply engaged in these issues you (Greg) cannot do that. The meaning is: it *would* be unsustainable *if* you actually started triaging. You don't triage now, because "a bug is a bug". -- Ian
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Attila Szasz (Oct 02)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Oct 02)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Attila Szasz (Oct 02)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Attila Szasz (Oct 03)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Oct 03)
- Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros nightmare . yeah27 (Oct 04)
- Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Oct 04)
- Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros nightmare . yeah27 (Oct 05)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Attila Szasz (Oct 02)
- Re: Re: Re: Linux kernel: HFS+ filesystem implementation, issues, exposure in distros Greg KH (Oct 02)
