oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Becoming a CVE Naming Authority for your project


From: Matthew Fernandez <matthew.fernandez () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:56:00 -0800



On 11/5/25 04:30, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Greg KH <greg () kroah com> writes:

I totally agree that all "major" open source projects should become a CNA,
and strongly recommend taking back control over stuff like this.

The problem is that individuals can't be CNAs…

Another problem for projects with few maintainers and resources is that it’s lower effort to dispute incorrect CVEs than register as a CNA, at least while CVE volume is low. This is obviously a worse outcome for downstream users who may have already started processing and dealing with the false CVE. I’m not saying this is a good approach, but just noting this is the way incentives are currently (mis)aligned.


Current thread: