oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG
From: Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:44:05 -0600
On 12/29/25 18:57, Peter Gutmann wrote:
[...] A solution for mission-critical use like authenticating downloaded binaries would be to do two things: 1. Create an app that does just that and nothing else: Here is a blob of data, here is a detached signature, is it valid for the data?
Does using gpgv(1) with detached signatures fit this bill?I am unsure what having a separate tool dedicated for verifying signatures using trusted keyrings says about the overall system...
-- Jacob
Current thread:
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG, (continued)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Jeffrey Walton (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Sam James (Dec 28)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Stephan Verbücheln (Dec 28)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Andreas Metzler (Dec 29)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Peter Gutmann (Dec 29)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Demi Marie Obenour (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Peter Gutmann (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Henrik Ahlgren (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Collin Funk (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Peter Gutmann (Dec 31)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Jacob Bachmeyer (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Jeffrey Walton (Dec 28)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Demi Marie Obenour (Dec 28)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Stephan Verbücheln (Dec 29)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Alan Coopersmith (Dec 30)
- Re: Many vulnerabilities in GnuPG Neal Gompa (Dec 29)
