oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor
From: Greg KH <gregkh () linuxfoundation org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:23:24 +0100
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 06:36:17PM +0000, Qualys Security Advisory wrote:
Since two weeks have passed now (since the fixes were released), would it be possible to please assign CVEs to the remaining seven AppArmor vulnerabilities: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e38c55d9f834e5b848bfed0f5c586aaf45acb825- "[PATCH 02/11] apparmor: fix memory leak in verify_header" (a memory leak);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab09264660f9de5d05d1ef4e225aa447c63a8747 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/306039414932c80f8420695a24d4fe10c84ccfb2- "[PATCH 03/11] apparmor: replace recursive profile removal with iterative approach" and "[PATCH 04/11] apparmor: fix: limit the number of levels of policy namespaces" (the uncontrolled recursion detailed in this advisory);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8756b68edae37ff546c02091989a4ceab3f20abd- "[PATCH 05/11] apparmor: fix side-effect bug in match_char() macro usage" (the out-of-bounds read detailed in this advisory);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d352873bbefa7eb39995239d0b44ccdf8aaa79a4- "[PATCH 06/11] apparmor: fix missing bounds check on DEFAULT table in verify_dfa()" (an out-of-bounds read and write);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5df0c44e8f5f619d3beb871207aded7c78414502- "[PATCH 07/11] apparmor: Fix double free of ns_name in aa_replace_profiles()" (the double-free detailed in this advisory);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39440b137546a3aa383cfdabc605fb73811b6093- "[PATCH 09/11] apparmor: fix differential encoding verification" (an infinite loop);------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0b7091c4de45a7325c8780e6934a894f92ac86b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e135b8aee5a06c52a4347a5a6d51223c6f36ba3- "[PATCH 10/11] apparmor: fix race on rawdata dereference" and "[PATCH 11/11] apparmor: fix race between freeing data and fs accessing it" (the use-after-free detailed in this advisory).------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you very much in advance! With best regards,
We were told that these all required elevated privileges to hit, and so were not classified as individual vulnerabilities. If the Apparmor maintainer tells us that these really all should be assigned a CVE, we will be glad to do so, but until then, we're just going to stick with the ones that we have assigned already. thanks, greg k-h
Current thread:
- Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 12)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 12)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 26)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Greg KH (Mar 27)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor kf503bla (Mar 27)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Greg KH (Mar 28)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor John Johansen (Mar 28)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Greg KH (Mar 29)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor John Johansen (Mar 31)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Greg KH (Mar 31)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 26)
- Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in AppArmor Qualys Security Advisory (Mar 12)
