oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers () kernel org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2026 03:35:56 +0000
On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 08:21:27PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I think the single biggest hardening win for AF_ALG would be to move to the crypto library. The recent CVEs you mentioned mostly seem to relate to the crypto API, and with a hard-coded list of allowed algorithms there's no need to use the crypto API anymore. I'm not familiar enough with kernel code to do this easily, but for anyone with basic knowledge of the existing code it should (hopefully) be straightforward. In the meantime, only using synchronous algorithms and not using hardware drivers would also be a useful simplification. The latter would make it especially clear that AF_ALG is deprecated, because its one potential advantage (being able to use hardware acceleration) would no longer be present.
The kernel's crypto library (https://docs.kernel.org/crypto/libcrypto.html) does greatly simplify a lot of kernel code that needs to use crypto algorithms. Yes, AF_ALG doesn't use it directly yet. Currently AF_ALG puts all the data in (zero-copy) scatterlists, then invokes the "traditional crypto API" which is very complex and has full scatterlist support, asynchronous execution support, an algorithm template system, etc. In some cases the crypto library is then used internally, but it's not called directly. So the idea would be something along the lines of: - Add an algorithm allowlist to AF_ALG. It would include only what the small set of userspace programs that uses it actually needs. Bizarre stuff like "authencesn" wouldn't be included. - Change AF_ALG to make it copy any data written to an AF_ALG file descriptor into an internal kernel buffer. Put the output in another internal kernel buffer, then copy it to userspace. No zero-copy, and no scatterlists. Both restrictions would greatly reduce the chance of bugs: the actual crypto algorithms would operate only on these internal buffers, not on pagecache data (e.g. the contents of 'su') or buffers that userspace can concurrently modify. The use of simple virtual addresses would eliminate all the scatterlist complexity. - AF_ALG would implement each algorithm by invoking the corresponding the crypto library functions (https://docs.kernel.org/crypto/libcrypto.html#api-documentation). No asynchronous execution, no buggy hardware crypto drivers, etc. It sounds good to me. For people who feel like the su binary on their system is a bit too restrictive and would like to fix that, these changes might not be all that great for them. But for the rest of us, they should work rather well. Of course, it'll also be a fair a bit of work, and unfortunately I also expect pushback from people who (incorrectly IMO) think that AF_ALG performance is important, even moreso than security. Either way, the first step will be to create the algorithm allowlist, which should happen anyway, regardless of the other changes. (By the way, for context: I maintain the kernel's crypto library, but not the kernel's "traditional crypto API". The latter is where AF_ALG and all these problems are, unfortunately.) - Eric
Current thread:
- Re: Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation, (continued)
- Re: Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Brian May (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation nightmare . yeah27 (May 02)
- Re: Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Reid Sutherland (May 03)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Sam James (Apr 30)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (Apr 30)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Demi Marie Obenour (May 01)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (May 01)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Demi Marie Obenour (May 01)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (May 01)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Demi Marie Obenour (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Demi Marie Obenour (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Greg Dahlman (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Greg Dahlman (May 02)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Simon McVittie (May 03)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Greg Dahlman (May 03)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Milan Broz (May 04)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Demi Marie Obenour (May 04)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Eric Biggers (May 04)
- Re: CVE-2026-31431: CopyFail: linux local privilege scalation Milan Broz (May 04)
