oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age
From: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith () oracle com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:52:37 -0700
On 4/28/26 07:58, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I'm sorely tempted, both due to the increased volume and the risk of premature disclosure, to just assume that any vulnerability reported as a result of research using an LLM is trivially discoverable by others, and give up trying to pretend there's any point to working it under embargo.
Other maintainers under similar floods seem to agree: Linux kernel: - https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/5/17/896 - https://docs.kernel.org/process/security-bugs.html DNS servers (BIND, Unbound, PowerDNS): - https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/contributions/1233/ - https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/contributions/1233/attachments/1180/2539/presentation.pdf -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith () oracle com Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris
Current thread:
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age, (continued)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Greg KH (May 16)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Demi Marie Obenour (May 15)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Clemens Lang (Apr 29)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Greg KH (Apr 30)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Lucas Holt (Apr 29)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Jeremy Stanley (Apr 29)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Brian May (Apr 29)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Tim Shephard (May 11)
- Sv: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Markus Klyver (May 15)
- Sv: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age ROI AI (May 15)
- Sv: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Markus Klyver (May 15)
- Re: Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age Alan Coopersmith (May 20)
