oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: GNU Inetutils talkd buffer overflow with long DNS names.
From: Tristan <TristanInSec () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:09:20 +0200
Hi Collin, Thank you very much for the smooth and professional collaboration on this issue, and glad to see CVE-2026-19720 assigned. Best regards, Tristan Madani *// Talence Security* Le sam. 15 août 2026 à 05:16, Collin Funk <collin.funk1 () gmail com> a écrit :
Collin Funk <collin.funk1 () gmail com> writes:## Timeline 2026-07-02: Report sent to inetutils-security () gnu org 2026-07-02: I (Collin Funk) acknowledged the report and asked a few questions regarding the issue. 2026-07-04: Tristan answered those questions. 2026-07-06: I reproduced the issue updated Tristan with a planned timeline for the fix and CVE assignment. 2026-07-08: Tristan agreed to the timeline and offered to review the patch. 2026-07-11: I wrote the patch and sent it to Tristan. 2026-07-15: Tristan confirmed the patch worked as expected. 2026-07-16: Private mail to distros mailing list along with thepatch.2026-07-24: I wrote this report and sent it to oss-security. Note that I also requested a CVE when emailing distros, but haven't heard back. I'll probably reach out privately to a CNA in a bit, and will update here once one is assigned.Red Hat assigned CVE-2026-19720 to this issue yesterday, 2028-08-13. Collin
Current thread:
- GNU Inetutils talkd buffer overflow with long DNS names. Collin Funk (Jul 25)
- Re: GNU Inetutils talkd buffer overflow with long DNS names. Collin Funk (Aug 14)
- Re: GNU Inetutils talkd buffer overflow with long DNS names. Tristan (Aug 18)
- Re: GNU Inetutils talkd buffer overflow with long DNS names. Collin Funk (Aug 14)
