oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely
From: Greg KH <greg () kroah com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:24:46 +0200
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 01:03:47AM -0400, Syed wrote:
Yes,https://www.google.com/url?q=http://cve.org&source=gmail&ust=1787893426670000&sa=E json records are known to have this issue, because almostall fields are not required.
Ah, I'm talking to a bot
{sigh}
Fair. Optional means a CNA leaving credits empty is behaving correctly, not incorrectly, and the post should have said that plainly. The squabbling you mention is the useful part, and it is in no spec.
The "squabbling" happens with people, and I think I'll stop responding here as this isn't going to go very well for everyone involved... greg k-h
Current thread:
- Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Syed (Aug 26)
- Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Greg KH (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Syed (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Greg KH (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Syed (Aug 26)
- Re: Reporter attribution is absent from GitHub's machine-readable vulnerability records, and from the NVD entirely Greg KH (Aug 26)
