PaulDotCom mailing list archives

Image based steganography that survives resizing?


From: irongeek at irongeek.com (Adrian Crenshaw)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:06:37 -0500

Bar codes could work, but I want only the computer to see the stego, not a
human. If I use a barcode, won't it show to the user?

Thanks,
Adrian

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Rob Fuller <jd.mubix at gmail.com> wrote:

Agreed about the EXIF data, but are you only talking about binary
steganography? You can hide barcodes in images pretty simply that
would survive resizing just fine. Also, are you talking human or
computer legible stego? Peoples choice of stego is highly dependent on
message size,message contents, repetition, and placement.

--
Rob Fuller | Mubix
Room362.com | Hak5.org | TheAcademyPro.com



On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jim Halfpenny <jim.halfpenny at gmail.com>
wrote:
Image metadata may survive (EXIF, copyright strings), it really depends
on
how the program manipulating the image handles the image and metadata
parts
of the file. Chances are if the hidden data is in the image data then it
will not survive resizing, changes to colour deptt, colour maps etc.

Jim

2010/1/27 Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek at irongeek.com>

Hi all,
    Does anyone know of any image based steganography that survives
resizing of the image? I'm looking into using blind drops, but many
sites
alter images that they post.

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com


_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100127/2046db76/attachment.htm 


Current thread: