Penetration Testing mailing list archives
[PEN-TEST] question
From: "Skullaria () Earthlink net" <skullaria () EARTHLINK NET>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:08:24 -0500
I hope someone can answer this for me. I was running win98 with zone alarm. I ran a netstat -a and it showed 123banners.com was listening on port 137, 138 and hour other higher grabbed ports. I thought perhaps I had spyware, but the 137 and port 138 port bugged me. I locked down zone and checked for running processes until I just had bare minimum running. Zone was locked except for netstat itself. Still, I was showing these ports were listening. I ran netcat from another machine and the ports were wide open, as if zone alarm wasn't there. I did notice however, that the 123banners.com was resolving to 0.0.0.0, so I looked at my host file. I have only a very slow dial up, so a few months back when I first started playing with tcp/ip and dns, I had altered it so that all banner ads resolved to 0.0.0.0. ( I had originally set to loopback but someone in a mail list mentioned it was even faster set to 0.0.0.0. so I did that.) Well, 123banners.com was at the top of that list. I set that entry to loopback, then watched as the next item down set to 0.0.0.0 took ports 137, 138 and grabbed some higher ports. I changed those hostfile entries I never want successfully resolved to loopback, and everything is ok now. My question is, why did that happen? What makes something set to resolve at 0.0.0.0 make ports wake up and open their digital ears? I don't know much about this stuff, I just seriously enjoy it. Can anyone explain this? Thanks, -Kristi
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] question Skullaria () Earthlink net (Dec 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] question Mike Forrester (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] question Plague, Grandmaster (Dec 17)
