Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: DENY x REJECT
From: Frank Knobbe <FKnobbe () KnobbeITS com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:44:03 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
-----Original Message----- From: Rosenau [mailto:rosenau () netsec com br] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:53 AM Does anybody know a port scanner that could distinguish a "deny" filtered tcp port (firewall drops packets for the port) from a "reject" filtered tcp port (firewall returns an ICMP - port unreachable)?. Nmap seems to report boths cases simply as "filtered". Actually, both cases are filtered, but when you receive a ICMP, you can be sure that the port is really filtered. If you do not receive nothing, the port could be filtered, or packets could have been lost...
I always run a tcpdump session along with scans to watch for interesting stuff like that. Also, variations in the responding TTL will give clues where system are located during sweep scans. tcpdump is your friend ;) Regards, Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 Comment: PGP or S/MIME (X.509) encrypted email preferred. iQA/AwUBO7y8A5ytSsEygtEFEQLDDwCbBnkDCBuCrEqdiZJi/opU/k9cXCkAnR6x Xr5ggplVEYmkMXyATefh1k56 =ciHI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see: https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
Current thread:
- DENY x REJECT Rosenau (Oct 04)
- Re: DENY x REJECT R. DuFresne (Oct 04)
- Re: DENY x REJECT Fyodor (Oct 04)
- RE: DENY x REJECT Ofir Arkin (Oct 09)
- Re: DENY x REJECT niceshorts (Oct 09)
- RE: DENY x REJECT Ofir Arkin (Oct 10)
- Re: DENY x REJECT niceshorts (Oct 10)
- Re: DENY x REJECT niceshorts (Oct 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DENY x REJECT Frank Knobbe (Oct 04)
- Fw: DENY x REJECT Mehmet Murat Gunsay (Oct 05)
